X Series
Code's surf-feel wing for all disciplines, with more anhedral for fluid roll transitions, refined tips that stay stable through breaches and a smooth lift profile for steep, critical sections. High-modulus carbon construction, aimed at riders who want to turn harder with control in wing, surf, wake, parawing and downwind.
Source: codefoils.com · checked 2026-09-21
Front wings 7
Compare all sizes| Size | Area | Wingspan | Aspect ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| 700X | 700 cm² | 755 mm | 8.2 |
| 740X | 740 cm² | 780 mm | 8.2 |
| 810X | 810 cm² | 814 mm | 8.2 |
| 890X | 890 cm² | 852 mm | 8.2 |
| 985X | 985 cm² | 896 mm | 8.2 |
| 1085X | 1085 cm² | 940 mm | 8.2 |
| 1195X | 1195 cm² | 987 mm | 8.2 |
Independent reviews
In-depth tests by riders and magazines, on their own sites. We link to them; the verdicts are theirs.
-
Quick Comparison: AFS Silk, Code X, KT Nomad
Tested: AFS Silk 850 (first generation), Code 810X, KT Nomad 830
Pros
- Nomad 830: absurd low end and pumping, makes sizing down easy; full shim kit included
- 810X: silent, slices through swell, smooth transition from glide to power
- Silk 850: dominant high end and a carve with real drive
Cons
- Nomad 830: restrained top end, takeoff feels too lifty when overpowered, more water feedback
- 810X: stiffens up when overpowered; bolt holes needed tinkering
- Silk 850: weakest pumper of the three
Verdict: Three foils for different days: Nomad for low power and sizing down, Silk when it's nuking, 810X when conditions line up.
Pros, cons and verdict summarised by foil.guide from the article, fetched 2026-09-25